Miroslav Hanke

Miroslav Hanke is a researcher at the Department for the Study of Ancient and Medieval Thought of the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences..


In the framework of the project, Miroslav focused primarily on logical issues in their many forms. His work included cooperating on the editorial work and doctrinal analysis of the logical parts of the 1409 quodlibetal handbook.


https://tinyurl.com/9scarcn7
hanke@flu.cas.cz


Education

2010 – Faculty of Arts, Palacký University in Olomouc, Ph.D. in Philosophy
2007 – Faculty of Arts, Palacký University in Olomouc, M.A. in Philosophy

Selected publications

  • M. HANKE, “The Logic of Impossible Scenarios in Hurtado de Mendoza’s Tractatus de Trinitate”, in Vivarium 59 (2021), 324–359.
  • M. HANKE, “Between Imagination and Gambling. The Forms of Validity in Scholastic Logic”, in History and Philosophy of Logic 41 (2020), 331–351.
  • M. HANKE, “Jesuit Probabilistic Logic between Scholastic and Academic Philosophy”, in History and Philosophy of Logic 40 (2019), 355–373.
  • M. HANKE, “The Probabilistic Logic of Eusebius Amort (1692–1775)”, in Early Science and Medicine 24 (2019), 186–211.
  • M. HANKE, Lhářské paradoxy u autorů italské scholastiky, Praha: OIKOYMENH, 2015.
  • M. HANKE, Jan Buridan a nominalistická teorie racionality. Studie k možnostem scholastické logiky , Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, 2011.
  • M. HANKE, „Paul of Venice and Realist Developments of Roger Swyneshed’s Treatment of Semantic Paradoxes“, in History and Philosophy of Logic 38 (2017), 299–315.
  • M. HANKE, „Jan Dullaert of Ghent on the Foundations of Propositional Logic“, in Vivarium 55 (2017), 273–306.
  • M. HANKE, „Semantic Paradox. A Comparative Analysis of Scholastic and Analytic Views“, in Res Philosophica 91 (2014), 367-386.
  • M. HANKE, „The Bricot–Mair Dispute: Scholastic Prolegomena to Non-Compositional Semantics“, in History and Philosophy of Logic 35 (2014), 149-166.
  • M. HANKE, „The Analysis of Deductive Validity in Martin Le Maistre’s Tractatus consequentiarum“, in American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 88 (2014), 29–46.
  • M. HANKE, „Implied-Meaning Analysis of the Currian Conditional“, in History and Philosophy of Logic 35 (2013), 367-380.